Learner Needs in Runnymede

This is an executive summary of a report which assesses the learning needs in Runnymede, details the barriers to learning people in the Borough face, looks at current participation, achievement, and retention rates, and also maps current provision in the Borough of both formal and informal learning.

Runnymede Borough lies in north-west Surrey some twenty miles south-west of Central London, with three main centres, Addlestone, Chertsey and Egham.  There are numerous trading estates and business parks within the borough.  There are 31,806 (March 2000) households in Runnymede, accomdating the population of 76,619 (mid 1999).

Assessment of Learning Needs

From the Department of the Environment (DoE) index of local conditions, Runnymede is listed as the worst borough (i.e. highest need) in Surrey at place 170 out of 366 in England and Wales.  However the borough has wards which are listed in the 'worst' 20 in Surrey and also in the 'best' 20 in Surrey.  The ward with the highest identified socio-economic need is Chertsey St Ann's.  Other wards which show up on the indices are Hythe, Addlestone North, Addlestone Bourneside, Chertsey Meads and Englefield Green West.  Wards which feature highly on the concern about crime also feature these wards.

In addition to geographical areas of need, there are also communities of need which have something in common and are throughout the borough.  These 'communities' include

  1. People with physical disabilities (White Lodge)
  2. Mental health problems (Project 18)
  3. Travellers (a large community of settled and roaming in Runnymede)
  4. Disaffected youth - St Ann's, Englefield Green, Chertsey
  5. Single/young parents - Chertsey, Englefield Green, Egham
  6. Basic Skills needs are identified in pockets throughout the borough, but 3 wards ranked in the top 20 of wards in Surrey for poor literacy and numeracy (Hythe, Chertsey St Ann's, Englefield Green West) with another two Addlestone Bourneside and Addlestone North included in the top 45. Runnymede has the highest percentage of all the boroughs in Surrey - 19% of the total population - for estimation of poor numeracy levels, and second highest estimated level of low literacy at 19.9%).
  7. Students who need learning support are also a 'group' with needs and are located throughout the borough in various settings.
  8. Ex offenders need links to learning opportunities which are not necessarily FE based.
  9. Labour market trends - Runnymede has 0.7% unemployment compared with 0.6% for Surrey and 3.2% for the rest of the UK.  Employers often find it difficult to fill a wide range of occupations - applicants often do not have required levels of numeracy and literacy.  Runnymede has a higher proportion of jobs than the county average in health and social work and construction.  In common with the rest of Surrey the most common vacancies placed by employers with Careers centres are clerical/secretarial, managerial/professional/technical, sales, skilled trades and childcare.
  10. Older People - there are health and social benefits which accrue from learning later in life.  Only figures for those attending adult education and further education from 60+ are available for Runnymede.

Barriers to Learning

Barriers exist which follow national trends - local ones in particular seem to be transport, self esteem, lack of interest.  No research has been conducted with non-learners but the following has emerged from interviews and other enquiries:

  • Communication barriers still seem to exist at operational level within departments of SCC - difficult to find information.
  • The same applies at operational level between the colleges although strategically all parties are in agreement.
  • Transport - a consideration when deciding on places to run learning. No research done into bus routes in Runnymede.
  • Teaching in off-site venues can be very isolating.  Staff employed are often part time hourly paid staff who may not be fully conversant with college systems for providing resources.  They often need a lot of support, which could be costly.  There is also the issue of safety here - is there a lone workers policy?
  • Childcare, particularly with some vulnerable groups, childcare is often a problem.
  • Support/relief for carers who may wish to learn and are unable to leave the home.
  • Basic skills needs, preventing understanding of what is available.
  • Self-esteem (very high on barriers in lone parents, vulnerable young)
  • Language barriers - in ethnic minority cases often cultural barriers exist (relevant to whether people will attend classes outside the home, different times, evening etc.)
  • Lack of interest/motivation/apathy - the 'not for me' attitude - often as a result of bad experiences at school.  
  • Cost - lack of awareness of funded provision.
  • Lack of IT experience or phobia about computers prohibits learning 'online'.
  • Family demands or 'no time' because of employment.
  • Lack of information - at the right place at the right time.
  • Lack of coherent provision - it still seems as though providers at the operational level put on what 'goes' - there are few pathways identified from informal to formal.  Competition element still exists.
  • Barriers identified specifically by Surrey Springboard for their particular clients were no staying power, 'keeping up', home life not conducive to study, disruptive lifestyle which clients are just coming to the point of dealing with.
  • Debt/funding, substance abuse, re-offending.
  • Pressure of the classroom - leading to mental blockages.
  • Education term times - September enrolment etc can be inconvenient for many people - more variety in start times/hours, delivery points etc.  Especially true of accredited  courses.
  • Older people often do not like to go out at night, and appreciate provision nearby, with transport during the day.  The same applies for classes in community settings - going to the learner.

Mapping Provision

Surrey is still below the levels expected in the National 2002 targets for 21 year olds.  Raw data from LSC analysed by ward indicates that retention and achievement rates for students attending FE colleges to be lower than expected.  Further in depth analysis may reveal more. LSC is currently reviewing its data.

The borough contains a variety of educational establishments including 25 infant/junior schools, 7 secondary schools, 3 Further/Higher Education providers including a 6th Form College, and two providers of an adult education service.

The borough contains a variety of educational establishments including 25 infant/junior schools, 7 secondary schools, 3 Further/Higher Education providers including a 6th Form College, and two providers of an adult education service.  there are several providers of post 16 education but currently there seems to be little linkage between some of them to provide pathways, although good practice is evident in the collaboration between Strode's College, Brooklands and White Lodge Centre, Parents as Educators at schools and joint work in Englefield Green.

Monitoring and evaluation by the CLP of any programmes which are carried out would include methods required by the Adult Learning Inspectorate, and pay attention to the LSC demands.  Methods could be identified which may also include community benefits such as less crime, fear of crime, better environment.

Good practice exists in several places in the borough, but in common with the rest of Surrey there is a shortage of basic skills teachers.  Recommendations include extending existing links between learning and the Health and Social Care sectors, the voluntary sector, local business in order to widen participation and ensure that local business participates in the work of the partnership. 

The partnership could identify monitoring and evaluation protocols and share information, possibly on a partner's or SLLP website with effective links.  Further research into non-learners is recommended.

Recommendations

Widening Participation

  • Improve links between learning and the Health and Social Care sectors
  • Discuss with Runnymede Borough Council the possibility of using the Council's focus groups of residents to investigate learning needs and non-participation in learning.
  • Strengthen links between the CLP and the voluntary sector, to help the sector identify its learning needs and as a way to make contact with hard-to-reach groups.
  • Develop further the relationship with business in Runnymede so that businesses' training and learning needs are identified, and to ensure that local business participates in the work of the partnership.
  • Investigate in greater depth the needs of supported learning students in the area ,and transport issues.

Partnership Working

  • The Partnership should identify ways in which projects could be recorded, managed, income received and accounted for, and bids for funding submitted.
  • A protocol for sharing information about learning needs, achievements and other key planning data between CLP partners and other local organisations could be developed.
  • Develop further relationships with providers used by local residents which are outside the borough boundaries.

Targeting Identified Needs

  • Build on successful family/parent learning activities already developed in Runnymede.
  • Consider strategies for 'holding on' to targeted vulnerable groups.
  • Extend research about learner needs for key groups; develop ways to monitor and evaluate progress once learning opportunities are developed.
  • Establish an accessible collection of data, possibly on the SLLP website or on a partner's website, with effective links.
  • Carry out further research on specific communities where this was not possible in the current plan: non-learners, hospital patients and staff, and supported learning students.

The Surrey CLPs:

For all enquiries contact:

contact Kevin Delf, Chief Executive, Surrey Lifelong Learning Partnership

Tel: 01483 715 013
Email: info@surreyllp.org.uk
Address: 48-54 Goldsworth Road, Woking, Surrey, GU21 6LE



New Lives Through Learning - Good Practice Booklet - Summer 2007...Click Here...